"""Generate SHEP Results Report PDF for Cuong's Torts essay (May 29, 2026). This report captures all feedback from the SHEP grading engine exactly as delivered: band score, overall feedback, structural notes (From SHEP's Eyes), issue-level feedback, and the grader's per-criterion findings. Source: upload session 26d50216-a239-4ed0-9799-74a278fdaf44 (MEE / TORTS). """ from reportlab.lib.pagesizes import letter from reportlab.lib.units import inch from reportlab.lib.colors import HexColor from reportlab.lib.styles import ParagraphStyle from reportlab.lib.enums import TA_LEFT, TA_JUSTIFY, TA_CENTER from reportlab.platypus import ( SimpleDocTemplate, Paragraph, Spacer, Table, TableStyle, HRFlowable, ) import os NAVY = HexColor("#1a2744") GOLD = HexColor("#c9a227") MED_TEXT = HexColor("#2d3748") LIGHT_TEXT = HexColor("#4a5568") BORDER = HexColor("#d4cfc5") WHITE = HexColor("#ffffff") ACTION_BG = HexColor("#f0f4ff") STRENGTH_BG = HexColor("#f0faf0") WARN_BG = HexColor("#fef3e6") RED_ACCENT = HexColor("#c53030") AMBER_ACCENT = HexColor("#b7791f") GREEN_ACCENT = HexColor("#276749") LIGHT_GRAY = HexColor("#f7f7f5") def make_styles(): s = {} s["title"] = ParagraphStyle("title", fontName="Helvetica-Bold", fontSize=16, textColor=NAVY, alignment=TA_LEFT, spaceAfter=1, leading=19) s["subtitle"] = ParagraphStyle("subtitle", fontName="Helvetica", fontSize=9, textColor=LIGHT_TEXT, alignment=TA_LEFT, spaceAfter=4, leading=11) s["band_big"] = ParagraphStyle("band_big", fontName="Helvetica-Bold", fontSize=28, textColor=RED_ACCENT, alignment=TA_CENTER, leading=32) s["band_label"] = ParagraphStyle("band_label", fontName="Helvetica", fontSize=8, textColor=LIGHT_TEXT, alignment=TA_CENTER, leading=10) s["section_label"] = ParagraphStyle("section_label", fontName="Helvetica-Bold", fontSize=8.5, textColor=GOLD, spaceBefore=10, spaceAfter=3, leading=11) s["h1"] = ParagraphStyle("h1", fontName="Helvetica-Bold", fontSize=11, textColor=NAVY, spaceBefore=8, spaceAfter=3, leading=13) s["h2"] = ParagraphStyle("h2", fontName="Helvetica-Bold", fontSize=9, textColor=MED_TEXT, spaceBefore=5, spaceAfter=2, leading=11) s["badge_ok"] = ParagraphStyle("badge_ok", fontName="Helvetica-Bold", fontSize=7.5, textColor=AMBER_ACCENT, spaceBefore=0, spaceAfter=1, leading=10) s["body"] = ParagraphStyle("body", fontName="Helvetica", fontSize=8.5, textColor=MED_TEXT, alignment=TA_JUSTIFY, leading=11.5, spaceBefore=1, spaceAfter=3) s["grader_item"] = ParagraphStyle("grader_item", fontName="Helvetica", fontSize=8, textColor=HexColor("#4a5568"), alignment=TA_LEFT, leading=10.5, leftIndent=12, spaceBefore=1, spaceAfter=1) s["strength"] = ParagraphStyle("strength", fontName="Helvetica", fontSize=8.5, textColor=GREEN_ACCENT, alignment=TA_LEFT, leading=11.5, spaceBefore=1, spaceAfter=1) s["footer"] = ParagraphStyle("footer", fontName="Helvetica", fontSize=7, textColor=LIGHT_TEXT, alignment=TA_LEFT, leading=9) return s ST = make_styles() def thin_hr(): return HRFlowable(width="100%", thickness=0.4, color=BORDER, spaceAfter=3, spaceBefore=4) def gold_hr(): return HRFlowable(width="25%", thickness=1, color=GOLD, spaceAfter=4, spaceBefore=2) def shaded_box(text, style, bg, border_color=None): bc = border_color or BORDER t = Table([[Paragraph(text, style)]], colWidths=["100%"]) t.setStyle(TableStyle([ ("BACKGROUND", (0,0), (-1,-1), bg), ("LEFTPADDING", (0,0), (-1,-1), 8), ("RIGHTPADDING", (0,0), (-1,-1), 8), ("TOPPADDING", (0,0), (-1,-1), 6), ("BOTTOMPADDING", (0,0), (-1,-1), 6), ("BOX", (0,0), (-1,-1), 0.3, bc), ])) return t def grader_bullets(items): """items: list of (passed: bool, text: str).""" elements = [] for passed, text in items: if passed: mark = '✓ ' else: mark = '✗ ' elements.append(Paragraph(mark + text, ST["grader_item"])) return elements def build(): output_dir = r"C:\Users\sallen\Desktop\SHEP\BAR PREP by SHEP\STUDENT ANSWERS\Cuong" output_path = os.path.join(output_dir, "Cuong_Torts_Results.pdf") doc = SimpleDocTemplate(output_path, pagesize=letter, leftMargin=0.65*inch, rightMargin=0.65*inch, topMargin=0.55*inch, bottomMargin=0.5*inch) story = [] # ================================================================ # HEADER # ================================================================ story.append(Paragraph("Essay Evaluation Report", ST["title"])) story.append(gold_hr()) story.append(Paragraph("TORTS | Uploaded Practice | May 29, 2026 | 922 words", ST["subtitle"])) # Band score box band_data = [ [Paragraph("3 / 6", ST["band_big"])], [Paragraph("SHEP PRACTICE BAND (modeled on MEE 1-6)", ST["band_label"])], [Paragraph("Below Passing Expectations", ST["band_label"])], ] band_table = Table(band_data, colWidths=[2.4*inch]) band_table.setStyle(TableStyle([ ("BACKGROUND", (0,0), (-1,-1), LIGHT_GRAY), ("ALIGN", (0,0), (-1,-1), "CENTER"), ("TOPPADDING", (0,0), (0,0), 8), ("BOTTOMPADDING", (0,-1), (0,-1), 8), ("BOX", (0,0), (-1,-1), 0.5, BORDER), ])) story.append(band_table) story.append(Spacer(1, 6)) # ================================================================ # OVERALL FEEDBACK # ================================================================ story.append(Paragraph("OVERALL FEEDBACK", ST["section_label"])) story.append(Paragraph( "This is a passing-level answer, but it falls short of a top-tier performance because your " "rule statements are generalized rather than element-specific. To improve, you must break " "down each legal test into its constituent parts and map those parts directly to the facts " "provided in the prompt. Avoid conclusory statements; instead, use the " "'Because [fact], [element] is satisfied' structure to ensure your analysis is rigorous.", ST["body"])) story.append(Paragraph( "Furthermore, ensure you are using precise legal terminology. Your framing of the " "'Samaritan rule' and the psychiatrist's duty to warn should be grounded in the standard " "elements of negligence and foreseeability rather than colloquial descriptions. By focusing " "on element-by-element application, you will move from merely identifying the issues to " "providing the thorough analysis required for a higher score.", ST["body"])) # ================================================================ # FROM SHEP'S EYES (Structural Feedback) # ================================================================ story.append(Paragraph("FROM SHEP'S EYES", ST["section_label"])) story.append(shaded_box( "You have a great grasp of how to organize your thoughts. Your use of distinct paragraphs " "for each call makes your essay very readable. You should focus on making your rule " "statements more precise. For example, in your analysis of the psychiatrist, you state the " "rule as needing a named person. A stronger version would be: Under the Tarasoff " "doctrine, a psychiatrist has a duty to warn when a patient makes a specific threat against " "an identifiable victim. Here, Ann made a vague threat against former classmates generally, " "rather than naming Susan specifically. Because Susan was not an identifiable victim, the " "psychiatrist had no duty to warn her. This connects your rule directly to the facts of " "the case.", ST["strength"], STRENGTH_BG, HexColor("#9ae6b4"))) story.append(Spacer(1, 2)) story.append(Paragraph( "Structure: Good. IRAC separation -- strong. Organization by call -- strong. " "Conclusion quality -- adequate (some conclusions repeat the analysis rather than " "synthesizing the legal outcome).", ST["body"])) story.append(Spacer(1, 4)) # ================================================================ # ISSUE 1: University Premises Liability # ================================================================ story.append(thin_hr()) story.append(Paragraph("RECOGNIZED | SATISFACTORY", ST["badge_ok"])) story.append(Paragraph("University's Duty to Protect (Premises Liability)", ST["h1"])) story.append(Paragraph( "Your analysis of premises liability is too generalized. While you correctly identify the " "duty to protect students, you fail to articulate the specific elements required to " "establish a breach in this context, such as the requirement of notice (actual or " "constructive) regarding the broken deadbolt. A stronger answer would explicitly state that " "a landowner breaches its duty when it fails to remedy a known or foreseeable dangerous " "condition on the premises. For example: 'Because the University had notice of the broken " "deadbolt on the rear entrance, its failure to repair the lock created an unreasonable risk " "of harm, thereby breaching its duty of care to Susan.'", ST["body"])) story.append(Paragraph("What the grader looked for:", ST["h2"])) story.extend(grader_bullets([ (True, "Issue spotting: Identifies the issue of whether the University had a duty " "to protect the student from an attack on its premises."), (True, "Rule: Provides a general definition of negligence and asserts a duty to " "protect students from outside parties, but lacks the specific elements of premises " "liability (such as notice or foreseeability)."), (True, "Facts: Identifies the specific facts regarding the broken deadbolt lock and " "the rear entrance."), (True, "Analysis: Attempts to connect the failure to fix the lock to the breach of " "duty, though the analysis is somewhat conclusory regarding the causation element."), (True, "Conclusion: Concludes that the University is liable and provides the " "reasoning that the breach of duty regarding the entrance led to the injuries."), ])) # ================================================================ # ISSUE 2: Jim's Failure to Rescue # ================================================================ story.append(thin_hr()) story.append(Paragraph("RECOGNIZED | SATISFACTORY", ST["badge_ok"])) story.append(Paragraph("Jim's Duty to Rescue / Voluntary Undertaking", ST["h1"])) story.append(Paragraph( "Your rule statement regarding the 'Samaritan rule' is imprecise. You should clarify that " "generally, there is no duty to rescue, but a duty may arise if the defendant's own conduct " "created the peril or if the defendant voluntarily undertakes to assist and does so " "negligently. Your analysis is conclusory; you state that Jim's actions did not rise to a " "duty without explaining why his specific conduct -- going to get help -- did not constitute " "a voluntary undertaking that increased the risk of harm or induced detrimental reliance. A " "stronger answer would analyze whether Jim's promise to get help caused Susan to forgo other " "potential avenues of assistance.", ST["body"])) story.append(Paragraph("What the grader looked for:", ST["h2"])) story.extend(grader_bullets([ (True, "Issue spotting: Identifies the issue of whether Susan can recover damages " "from Jim based on his comments and actions regarding assistance."), (True, "Rule: Articulates a rule regarding the duty to assist, noting that mere " "talking does not create a duty, while intentional actions to assist can create " "liability."), (True, "Facts: Identifies relevant facts, specifically that Jim made comments to " "assist and that he went to get help."), (True, "Analysis: Attempts to connect the facts to the rule by arguing that Jim's " "actions did not rise to the level of a duty because he did not take further steps " "or cause detrimental reliance."), (True, "Conclusion: Concludes that Susan cannot recover damages because Jim did not " "have a duty to assist her."), ])) # ================================================================ # ISSUE 3: Psychiatrist's Duty to Warn # ================================================================ story.append(thin_hr()) story.append(Paragraph("RECOGNIZED | SATISFACTORY", ST["badge_ok"])) story.append(Paragraph("Psychiatrist's Duty to Warn (Tarasoff)", ST["h1"])) story.append(Paragraph( "While you reach the correct conclusion, your framing of the duty to warn is incomplete. You " "correctly identify the need for a 'named person,' but you should frame this within the " "broader requirement of foreseeability: a psychiatrist's duty to protect is triggered when a " "patient makes a specific, credible threat against an identifiable victim. Your analysis is " "better here, but ensure you explicitly connect the psychiatrist's lack of belief in Ann's " "intent to the legal standard of 'foreseeability' rather than just stating the psychiatrist's " "subjective belief.", ST["body"])) story.append(Paragraph("What the grader looked for:", ST["h2"])) story.extend(grader_bullets([ (False, "Issue spotting: Identifies the issue as whether Susan can recover damages " "from the psychiatrist, but fails to explicitly name or clearly reference the " "specific legal theory of a psychiatrist's duty to warn or protect third parties."), (True, "Rule: Articulates a rule regarding the duty to warn a named person if a " "patient shares an intent to attack, which captures the essence of the Tarasoff " "duty, though it is phrased somewhat awkwardly."), (True, "Facts: Identifies the relevant facts that there was no named person to warn " "and that the psychiatrist did not believe the patient would attack a specific " "person."), (True, "Analysis: Connects the absence of a named victim and the lack of belief in " "the patient's intent to the conclusion that no duty existed."), (True, "Conclusion: Reaches a clear conclusion that the psychiatrist is not liable, " "supported by the reasoning that the duty was not triggered."), ])) # ================================================================ # ISSUE 4: PTSD / Eggshell Plaintiff # ================================================================ story.append(thin_hr()) story.append(Paragraph("RECOGNIZED | SATISFACTORY", ST["badge_ok"])) story.append(Paragraph("PTSD Damages (Eggshell Plaintiff)", ST["h1"])) story.append(Paragraph( "Your treatment of the eggshell plaintiff rule is insufficient because you fail to connect " "the rule to the facts of the case. You state the rule generally but do not explain how it " "applies to Susan's specific PTSD symptoms. A stronger answer would explicitly state: " "'Under the eggshell plaintiff rule, a defendant is liable for the full extent of the " "plaintiff's injuries, even if those injuries are exacerbated by a pre-existing condition. " "Because the University's negligence caused the attack, it is liable for the resulting PTSD, " "regardless of Susan's prior vulnerability.'", ST["body"])) story.append(Paragraph("What the grader looked for:", ST["h2"])) story.extend(grader_bullets([ (True, "Issue spotting: Explicitly identifies the issue of whether Susan can recover " "damages for PTSD symptoms."), (True, "Rule: Articulates the eggshell plaintiff rule, noting that a defendant is " "responsible for injuries even if they existed prior to the negligence."), (False, "Facts: Mentions PTSD symptoms but fails to cite specific facts from the " "prompt regarding the nature of the injury or the pre-existing condition."), (False, "Analysis: Provides a conclusory statement that the University breached a " "duty, but fails to connect the eggshell plaintiff rule to the specific facts of " "Susan's PTSD."), (True, "Conclusion: Reaches a conclusion that Susan can recover damages, but the " "reasoning is bare and lacks a strong connection to the rule."), ])) # ================================================================ # FOOTER # ================================================================ story.append(Spacer(1, 12)) story.append(HRFlowable(width="100%", thickness=0.4, color=BORDER, spaceAfter=4, spaceBefore=4)) story.append(Paragraph("Bar Prep by SHEP | Essay Evaluation Report | May 29, 2026", ST["footer"])) doc.build(story) return output_path if __name__ == "__main__": path = build() print(f"Results report: {path}")